I don't expect an answer, either--at least one that's worth anything.

St. Lou wrote:

BRUINSFAN wrote: St. Lou wrote: Maybe MF is still pissed at the Topeker idiots for their antics at Nationals? Still waiting for you to report on that "Skipped Check"... You're a fuckin' liar...and still a fuckin' TOOL... HEY TOPEKER DUMB FUCK. I am not a cop, just repeated what the employees of the establishment said. I know it is difficult for you to grasp that simple concept. For all I know they did file charges and arrested someone. Or maybe they wrote it off as a business loss. I don't know, nor do I care. I just repeated what was said to me. The guy had no reason to lie, he just was making small talk when he saw my son's T-shirt from the Nationals on it. So try to read carefully DUMB FUCK.... no report needed or coming, just try to continue to turn your ignorant fans actions into another ignorant statement. Hope your boys enjoy those two long trips to Alaska while we are playing 100 miles away in Springfield. LOL!

" . . . what the employees of the establishment said." When you started telling this tale it was just one waiter. How many other figments of your imagination are in this thing?

"The guy had no reason to lie." People who don't exist never have a reason to lie.

Re: HEY LOU?

St. Lou wrote:

BUCKETMAN wrote: Hey LOU what resturant was that agin oh yeah you never said did you we are still wanting to clear that up so post it hear or shut the f*(*() up about it! BUCKETMAN Jason Simonsen Not hiding behind the post name gher nor a lie! Oh yeah, give the name of the establishment to the idiots like you on this board. That would be real bright, god only knows what you will do next time to the place. Let me give you a hint, if you don't like to look like idiots, the next time don't be drunken fools like you were at Nationals. It was a complete embarrassment. Obviously, the Topeker fans behavior didn't change much after they left the rink. Sorry if your actions here were deplorable, but don't be pissed at me because of your actions!

A restaurant that loses out on a big check rarely doesn't call the police department. So since you keep coming up with excuses for not giving us the name of the restaurant, let's try it this way. What police jurisdiction were you in? We can always contact the police directly to get the information.

Of course, if you leave it to me to start with the Chesterfield Police and work around the area . . . well, never mind. Just tell us the restaurant or the police department, or admit that you just flat out lied through your teeth.

Does anyone have anything to say about the schedule? I'm just glad we're getting closer to the season. I'm sick of summer!

My apologies to those who wish to talk about the schedule. But I promised some time ago that I was not going to let St. Lou's piece of science fiction go unchecked until we got some resolution to the story. And right now, ONLY ST. LOU can provide the resolution by either revealing the restaurant, the police jurisdiction, or admit there's nothing to the story.

You know I was thinking this may have been a waiter that got stiffed on his or her TIP , Because the service was so bad . Which is understandable . because if a business got stiffed on a large ticket and they knew the people were from Topeka , the police would have been called and car tags gotten and turned to police . , so this could be a person that didn't do their job , and are just mad because they didn't get a tip ???????? You Think( just trying to settle this thing )

Blade it would be the Chesterfield Police Department Jurisdiction and there were no Police reports of theft of any sort filed by any restaurant in the City for that weekend.

On the scheduling front we are OK with the schedule seeing as we now have more opportunities to frequent Chesterfields eating establishments. I'm kidding with that one.

But we do play St. Louis more and Springfield more so we can go to more road games. The two trips to Alaska are going to be tough on the team but it's something that has to be done by someone.

ENOUGH ABOUT THAT . To the SCHEDULE , I'll Bet the CUP WINNER this year Comes from the South , ????????

Hey Mc - Bucket , all you Topeka folks , can't wait to see you Guys again, We'll plan something this year when you guys come to Town . KO

Lloyd4 wrote:

You know I was thinking this may have been a waiter that got stiffed on his or her TIP , Because the service was so bad . Which is understandable . because if a business got stiffed on a large ticket and they knew the people were from Topeka , the police would have been called and car tags gotten and turned to police . , so this could be a person that didn't do their job , and are just mad because they didn't get a tip ???????? You Think( just trying to settle this thing )

Hey Lloyd how you doing?
BTW, the tip was added onto our bill because there were so many in our group(about 20), and a lot of restaurants do that. But you're right, the waiter may have expected more or the resaurant didn't give him his tips.

Doing great Mc . you guys make plans to get here an hour or so earlier this year . It looks like ya'll be here 11/ 14 -- and 15 I'll set up a tail gate deal to eat before the game . I'll get back later with details as it gets closer .

Lloyd4 wrote:

You know I was thinking this may have been a waiter that got stiffed on his or her TIP , Because the service was so bad . Which is understandable . because if a business got stiffed on a large ticket and they knew the people were from Topeka , the police would have been called and car tags gotten and turned to police . , so this could be a person that didn't do their job , and are just mad because they didn't get a tip ???????? You Think( just trying to settle this thing )

Lloyd, when I first read St. Lou's post back in May, this is what I thought. Most waiters / waitresses I've known use the word "stiffed" when they get a low or no tip, not when there's a walkout. But I wouldn't expect St. Lou to get that distinction.

MC, I should have known you guys had already checked with the Chesterfield police. But look at it this way--it gives St. Lou a chance to add a new element to the story by saying it was outside Chesterfield.

OK, unless St. Lou decides to honor us with one of her colorful and completely useless responses, I'll try to let discussion continue about the schedule!

OK...back on topic....

Hey guys, what about that schedule for next season...



OH, BTW...St.Loo is a fuckin' liar...

Topeka Blade wrote:

St. Lou wrote: mctopeka wrote: Stephen Heisler wrote: Just curious but... in this day of electronic check transactions, what kind of place does not have this, or telechek that does basically the same thing. If a place does not have this, why take an "out of state" check? Sounds like BS to me. Stephen that's exactly what it is, some B/S he/she made up. We've asked him/her on many occasions to tell us what establishment he/she was refering to, so we could make it up to them if something did indeed happen, and to this day he/she hasn't told us. First it was several of us skipped out on several checks amounting to a lot of money and the cops were called and arrests made, but yet we couldn't find any Chesterfield Police reports. Then he/she changed his/her mind and it became a couple of us skipped out on checks and the cops were called and he/she didn't know if arrests were made, and yet we still couldn't find any reports by the Chesterfield Police. Then it became someone from the establishment told him about something and now he/she doesn't know exactly what happened and isn't sure if a Police Report was filed or not. Oh yeah, now that establishment may have just written it off as a "Business Loss". It's funny how this story keeps changing. The story has never changed, in fact YOU FUCKING LIAR, lets just see you prove it! Show me in a previous post that it has changed. I HATE LIARS LIKE YOU! I AM CALLING YOU OUT! PROVE IT OR SHUT THE FUCK UP! Well, St. Louse, I see you haven't changed a bit . . . This is from the post that started it all, on the "Semis-MV vs. Topeka" thread, posted by St. Louse on May 6 at 4:40 p.m.: ". . . I heard an extremely funny story today at an establishment near the rink. The guy waiting my table saw my son's Bandits T-shirt. Conversation started about last week and the people who used this particular place. He told me how he was stiffed by 20 something people with "roadrunners" garb on. Class act you guys are, aren't you? I know, you can't lump all Topekerins into one bucket because 20 of you stiffed this guy . . ." Get that? 20 people stiffed a waiter. Presumably for the whole tab. Nothing about "part of the bill." Let's move ahead to the "Jeez . . ." thread, where Lloyd tried to ask St. Louse a civil question. On May 12 at 1:15 p.m., you responded to him with this: "Lloyd, if you can read, I stated they stiffed them for part of the bill. Please read before you make yourself look so foolish." It took six days for "part of the bill" to surface. Need I go on? It's really amazing. You have the chance to right a wrong by identifying the restaurant so the bill, even two months after the alleged "fact," could be paid. But you continue in engaging in slander. Everybody's a liar but poor, maligned St. Louse. So come on--identify the restaurant already. Because right now, it's you that people are finding hard to believe.

Are you fucking kidding me? LET ME TYPE SLOWLY..... YOU WILL NEVER GET THE RESTAURANTS NAME. I would never put this in a ridiculous position of having to deal with idiots like yourself. All you have to do is read your idiotic posts to realize you Topeker fools are completely irrational.

Again, I call you out, my story NEVER CHANGED. And you are too stupid to realize it.

Let me give all of you a hint, next time, pay your bill!

This just handed to me... *rustles a piece of paper and starts reading in a Ted Knight voice*

It was confirmed today that St. Lou has a big bag of nothing and has been rendered completely irrelevant on GR... Lurkers and posters alike may now safely ignore any and all posts by said individual.

That is all... we now return you to your irregularly scheduled idiocy...

I should just sit back and agree with Marc . . . but it should be said that it is interesting that the Topekans would love to get the police involved, and St. Louse is trying to avoid it. It would probably be a waste of police time to pursue it, but then, we do have an accusation of a crime by St. Lou . . . why not let them track her down?

Kev?

Kev, is there cause for a slander on St Louis Part?

BUCKET

I thought about this and say no, if only because it's not directed at a specific individual...

St. Louse is probably guilty of nothing more than verbal diarrhea . . . if Imodium came out with a treatment, St. Louse could be the spokesperson.

In any case, even I'll admit to giving this idiot far more attention than is deserving. St. Louse's words speak for themselves, and we know exactly what kind of person she is.

Now . . . what schedule were we talking about?

Last edited by Topeka Blade on Thu Jul 10, 2008 1:55 pm; edited 1 time in total

Get her Kev! Her story is a pile of BS. File in Kansas, make her have to drive over to defend herself. Getting a judgement would be easy, getting any money out of her would be all but impossible, but it is the principle of the thing.