Jtornado wrote:

jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: fred wrote: 43x more likely to be shot? way more likley to get shot by a white kid at school than a black kid. Please cite the study that backs up this claim. Please...once... that would be the columbine study. or is it the jonesboro study. the santana study? damn, there are so many who can keep them straight. Link or cite please that sys that white kids are more likely to get killed at schhol than minorities...please

i have no idea who is getting shot. but i KNOW who is doing the shooting. here's a hint. "3/4 of the attackers were white".
ps-i don't do homework for other people. if you want links you will have to look them up yourself .

jc wrote:

Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: fred wrote: 43x more likely to be shot? way more likley to get shot by a white kid at school than a black kid. Please cite the study that backs up this claim. Please...once... that would be the columbine study. or is it the jonesboro study. the santana study? damn, there are so many who can keep them straight. Link or cite please that sys that white kids are more likely to get killed at schhol than minorities...please i have no idea who is getting shot. but i KNOW who is doing the shooting. here's a hint. "3/4 of the attackers were white". ps-i don't do homework for other people. if you want links you will have to look them up yourself .

You made the claim, not me...

please, cite or admit you are wrong.

I'll be shocked if jc actually links to any facts. it would definitely be a first around here. So I went looking for his source, but all I could find what this
http://www.maec.org/stats.html#violence

I couldn't find anything more recent then 1995, but the numbers were quite shocking.

Jtornado wrote:

jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: fred wrote: 43x more likely to be shot? way more likley to get shot by a white kid at school than a black kid. Please cite the study that backs up this claim. Please...once... that would be the columbine study. or is it the jonesboro study. the santana study? damn, there are so many who can keep them straight. Link or cite please that sys that white kids are more likely to get killed at schhol than minorities...please i have no idea who is getting shot. but i KNOW who is doing the shooting. here's a hint. "3/4 of the attackers were white". ps-i don't do homework for other people. if you want links you will have to look them up yourself . You made the claim, not me... please, cite or admit you are wrong.

i don't do homework for others. find it yourself. 75% of the school shooters are white. 12% are black.

mschris wrote:

I'll be shocked if jc actually links to any facts. it would definitely be a first around here. So I went looking for his source, but all I could find what this http://www.maec.org/stats.html#violence I couldn't find anything more recent then 1995, but the numbers were quite shocking.

1993!!?? at least mine are from this century.
i agree, though, the numbers are "shocking". the census consistently shows that racism and discrimination cause blacks to have higher unemployment, lower incomes and lower educational levels. "shocking!"

"why would anyone want their precious little white kids to get the same educations they've been expecting minority kids to make do with forever (when a minority kid could even get an education that is). as usual, what i like best about this is how the racists spend all their time complaining about the very problems their own racism causes. "

I can't imagine anything more important when choosing were you want to live than the quality of the schools. (when you have young kids of course) The darkie familys don't have to live there. They could rent a house from me in a good area.

fred wrote:

"why would anyone want their precious little white kids to get the same educations they've been expecting minority kids to make do with forever (when a minority kid could even get an education that is). as usual, what i like best about this is how the racists spend all their time complaining about the very problems their own racism causes. " I can't imagine anything more important when choosing were you want to live than the quality of the schools. (when you have young kids of course) The darkie familys don't have to live there. They could rent a house from me in a good area.

as ususal, racists created the very problem you are complaining about. the reason the city schools aren't very good is because the tax base moved from the cities so white kids wouldn't have to go to school with black kids.

jc wrote:

Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: fred wrote: 43x more likely to be shot? way more likley to get shot by a white kid at school than a black kid. Please cite the study that backs up this claim. Please...once... that would be the columbine study. or is it the jonesboro study. the santana study? damn, there are so many who can keep them straight. Link or cite please that sys that white kids are more likely to get killed at schhol than minorities...please i have no idea who is getting shot. but i KNOW who is doing the shooting. here's a hint. "3/4 of the attackers were white". ps-i don't do homework for other people. if you want links you will have to look them up yourself . You made the claim, not me... please, cite or admit you are wrong. i don't do homework for others. find it yourself. 75% of the school shooters are white. 12% are black.

Please cite...again, your claim, not mine. Feel free to back it up. Guess you can't even do your own homework.

Jtornado wrote:

jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: fred wrote: 43x more likely to be shot? way more likley to get shot by a white kid at school than a black kid. Please cite the study that backs up this claim. Please...once... that would be the columbine study. or is it the jonesboro study. the santana study? damn, there are so many who can keep them straight. Link or cite please that sys that white kids are more likely to get killed at schhol than minorities...please i have no idea who is getting shot. but i KNOW who is doing the shooting. here's a hint. "3/4 of the attackers were white". ps-i don't do homework for other people. if you want links you will have to look them up yourself . You made the claim, not me... please, cite or admit you are wrong. i don't do homework for others. find it yourself. 75% of the school shooters are white. 12% are black. Please cite...again, your claim, not mine. Feel free to back it up. Guess you can't even do your own homework.

i state facts. i don't do homework for others. look it up yourself.

jc wrote:

Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: fred wrote: 43x more likely to be shot? way more likley to get shot by a white kid at school than a black kid. Please cite the study that backs up this claim. Please...once... that would be the columbine study. or is it the jonesboro study. the santana study? damn, there are so many who can keep them straight. Link or cite please that sys that white kids are more likely to get killed at schhol than minorities...please i have no idea who is getting shot. but i KNOW who is doing the shooting. here's a hint. "3/4 of the attackers were white". ps-i don't do homework for other people. if you want links you will have to look them up yourself . You made the claim, not me... please, cite or admit you are wrong. i don't do homework for others. find it yourself. 75% of the school shooters are white. 12% are black. Please cite...again, your claim, not mine. Feel free to back it up. Guess you can't even do your own homework. i state facts. i don't do homework for others. look it up yourself.

If it is a "Fact" that you are stating then you must have some stats to back it up. How is it my "homework"? You are making the claim. For the 5th time, please cite your proof.

"as ususal, racists created the very problem you are complaining about. the reason the city schools aren't very good is because the tax base moved from the cities so white kids wouldn't have to go to school with black kids. "

They don't have to stay there either. Fair housing laws, right?

Jtornado wrote:

If it is a "Fact" that you are stating then you must have some stats to back it up. How is it my "homework"? You are making the claim. For the 5th time, please cite your proof.

He won't do it. He likes to throw out random bullshit claims and then refuses to provide proof, because none exists and he knows it. Or, in other cases, someone does some digging and finds his source & it turns out that he didn't want anyone to know where he got his information because it's easily disproven and he knows it.

Jtornado wrote:

jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: Jtornado wrote: jc wrote: fred wrote: 43x more likely to be shot? way more likley to get shot by a white kid at school than a black kid. Please cite the study that backs up this claim. Please...once... that would be the columbine study. or is it the jonesboro study. the santana study? damn, there are so many who can keep them straight. Link or cite please that sys that white kids are more likely to get killed at schhol than minorities...please i have no idea who is getting shot. but i KNOW who is doing the shooting. here's a hint. "3/4 of the attackers were white". ps-i don't do homework for other people. if you want links you will have to look them up yourself . You made the claim, not me... please, cite or admit you are wrong. i don't do homework for others. find it yourself. 75% of the school shooters are white. 12% are black. Please cite...again, your claim, not mine. Feel free to back it up. Guess you can't even do your own homework. i state facts. i don't do homework for others. look it up yourself. If it is a "Fact" that you are stating then you must have some stats to back it up. How is it my "homework"? You are making the claim. For the 5th time, please cite your proof.

75% of the school shooters were white. that is a FACT. if you want to verify things, do your own homework. if not, just take my word for it. or don't. under any circumstances, i won't be putting up any links. all that leads to is all of us having to look at a massive number of links to bullshit internet sites with so-called facts that are nothing but made up info to support a specific position.

"75% of the school shooters were white. that is a FACT"


What percentage were darkies?

5forfighting wrote:

Jtornado wrote: If it is a "Fact" that you are stating then you must have some stats to back it up. How is it my "homework"? You are making the claim. For the 5th time, please cite your proof. He won't do it. He likes to throw out random bullshit claims and then refuses to provide proof, because none exists and he knows it. Or, in other cases, someone does some digging and finds his source & it turns out that he didn't want anyone to know where he got his information because it's easily disproven and he knows it.

i know you boys think that "links" have magicalal internet powers and are proof of something. they aren't. and you have proved that time after time.
i don't post them because people like you can easily find some internet bullshit that you can say disproves what i say. like the 43x gun study, i quoted a valid, reliable, scientific study and you tried to refute it with so-called "studies" that turned out to be nothing but opinions and commentary from the gun lobby. and, when pressed to provide one valid, reliable sicentific study, you couldn't. not in all of the many "links" you provided.

fred wrote:

"75% of the school shooters were white. that is a FACT" What percentage were darkies?

12% of school shooter were black

It would appear then on a percentage basis the other 13% are really the problem.

fred wrote:

It would appear then on a percentage basis the other 13% are really the problem.

if you are a student in a u.s. school, it looks like you would be better off to avoid angry white guys with access to guns. i know this conflicts with the racist bullshit that jt and 5for would have you believe, but it is just a FACT.

jc wrote:

i won't be putting up any links. all that leads to is all of us having to look at a massive number of links to bullshit internet sites with so-called facts that are nothing but made up info to support a specific position.

At least you finally admit it.

jc wrote:

5forfighting wrote: Jtornado wrote: If it is a "Fact" that you are stating then you must have some stats to back it up. How is it my "homework"? You are making the claim. For the 5th time, please cite your proof. He won't do it. He likes to throw out random bullshit claims and then refuses to provide proof, because none exists and he knows it. Or, in other cases, someone does some digging and finds his source & it turns out that he didn't want anyone to know where he got his information because it's easily disproven and he knows it. i know you boys think that "links" have magicalal internet powers and are proof of something. they aren't. and you have proved that time after time. i don't post them because people like you can easily find some internet bullshit that you can say disproves what i say. like the 43x gun study, i quoted a valid, reliable, scientific study and you tried to refute it with so-called "studies" that turned out to be nothing but opinions and commentary from the gun lobby. and, when pressed to provide one valid, reliable sicentific study, you couldn't. not in all of the many "links" you provided.

Actually, that "study" was done by an anti-gun nut to begin with. He had his results in mind beforehand, and then altered his research to fit his hypothesis.

By the way, it doesn't take studies or research to refute the 43X bullshit. It just takes logic.