"the welfare success stories'


For every one of those there are probably 2 or 3 third generation welfare families.

jc wrote:

Kermie wrote: Wrong ,you are the one implying or injecting words in my post.If you think I was saying the majority of people on welfare are to lazy or wants everything handed to them then perhaps you are the one that is stereotyping not me. EVERY time you post about poor people and welfare it is the same thing. you start off talking about people who are lazy, won't work and just sit around and draw welfare. EVERY time. as soon as you spend as much time talking about the positive things that poor people do (like doing the menial, low-wage jobs that provide you with all the cheap goods and services you so enjoy) and the welfare success stories, then i will think you are up to something other than simply bashing poor people by stereoptyping them.

Start a topic about the who are trying to work then I will make comments on that topic.At least those people do get off their rumps and try that's more then what I can say for the ones who sponges off the welfare system

fred wrote:

"the welfare success stories' For every one of those there are probably 2 or 3 third generation welfare families.

you know that isn't true. besides, the few inter-generational welfare families there are simply haven't "been restored to full membership in the larger community." once people like you quit dogging them maybe they will get restored.

Kermie wrote:

jc wrote: Kermie wrote: Wrong ,you are the one implying or injecting words in my post.If you think I was saying the majority of people on welfare are to lazy or wants everything handed to them then perhaps you are the one that is stereotyping not me. EVERY time you post about poor people and welfare it is the same thing. you start off talking about people who are lazy, won't work and just sit around and draw welfare. EVERY time. as soon as you spend as much time talking about the positive things that poor people do (like doing the menial, low-wage jobs that provide you with all the cheap goods and services you so enjoy) and the welfare success stories, then i will think you are up to something other than simply bashing poor people by stereoptyping them. Start a topic about the who are trying to work then I will make comments on that topic.At least those people do get off their rumps and try that's more then what I can say for the ones who sponges off the welfare system

i have a better idea. you spread your negative stereoptypes about poor people and i will point out what you are doing.

jc wrote:

fred wrote: "the welfare success stories' For every one of those there are probably 2 or 3 third generation welfare families. you know that isn't true. besides, the few inter-generational welfare families there are simply haven't "been restored to full membership in the larger community." once people like you quit dogging them maybe they will get restored.

This may very well be the most stupid post you've ever made.

5forfighting wrote:

jc wrote: fred wrote: "the welfare success stories' For every one of those there are probably 2 or 3 third generation welfare families. you know that isn't true. besides, the few inter-generational welfare families there are simply haven't "been restored to full membership in the larger community." once people like you quit dogging them maybe they will get restored. This may very well be the most stupid post you've ever made.

blame fred. he is the one who posted the article that said the key to helping people off of welfare was to "restore them to full membership in the larger community."
ps-i would put more stock in your criticism of my post if i thought you had any idea of what it meant.

jc wrote:

5forfighting wrote: jc wrote: fred wrote: "the welfare success stories' For every one of those there are probably 2 or 3 third generation welfare families. you know that isn't true. besides, the few inter-generational welfare families there are simply haven't "been restored to full membership in the larger community." once people like you quit dogging them maybe they will get restored. This may very well be the most stupid post you've ever made. blame fred. he is the one who posted the article that said the key to helping people off of welfare was to "restore them to full membership in the larger community." ps-i would put more stock in your criticism of my post if i thought you had any idea of what it meant.

You are actually suggesting that people who pass welfare as a way of life through multiple generations are only there because intelligent people disapprove of them milking the system? You are a special kind of fucking idiot.

5forfighting wrote:

jc wrote: 5forfighting wrote: jc wrote: fred wrote: "the welfare success stories' For every one of those there are probably 2 or 3 third generation welfare families. you know that isn't true. besides, the few inter-generational welfare families there are simply haven't "been restored to full membership in the larger community." once people like you quit dogging them maybe they will get restored. This may very well be the most stupid post you've ever made. blame fred. he is the one who posted the article that said the key to helping people off of welfare was to "restore them to full membership in the larger community." ps-i would put more stock in your criticism of my post if i thought you had any idea of what it meant. You are actually suggesting that people who pass welfare as a way of life through multiple generations are only there because intelligent people disapprove of them milking the system? You are a special kind of fucking idiot.

talk to fred. he posted the article. besides, just as i figured, you have no idea what the quote from the article is even talking about.